Dnes Bloombergtv.bg Investor Gol Automedia Tialoto Az-Jenata Az-deteto Teenproblem Puls Imoti.net Rabota Start Blog Aha Snimka
imoti net - порталът за недвижими имоти
 


Добре дошли! Вход Създаване на нов профил

Разширено

Преглед на печата - 2010

Публикувано от general 
Re: Преглед на печата - 2010
19-03-2010 - 12:59:31
Quote
rz3bvd
BULCAN
Ne e neobhodimo da giveete 6 meseza v Kanada ili USA , za da si poluchavate pensiqta.
Ima takova ogranichenie za Kanadskite giteli giveli po-malko ot xx godini. Ne si spomnqm tochno, no ako dargite moga da proucha i vi uvedomq.
Opredeleno v segashnite usloviq da se imigrira v Evropa e mnogo po-izgodno, s po-malko stres i po- barzo vpisvane v sredata ot emigrirane otvad okeana.

Това е интересно, може и да е променен закона нещо. През 2001 г. при един полет от Торонто до София (с прикачване) в самолета се паднах до един възрастен българин-пенсионер, живеещ в Канада от 1960-те. Та той ми каза, че за да си получава канадската пенсия в БГ, трябва минимум 6 месеца от календарната година да живее в Канада. Не, че това ми е приоритет (далеч съм все още от тази възраст, дай Боже да доживея до нея и зад нея), но е добре да се мисли за нещата и в переспектива.

Иначе и аз смятам, че в Европа е по-лесно за емиграция (по-скоро преместване) от БГ. Не е като САЩ и Канада да си нямат също своите предимства (то и те са доста различни помежду си).

Бъди здрав(а)!
Re: Преглед на печата - 2010
19-03-2010 - 13:21:49
Re: Преглед на печата - 2010
19-03-2010 - 14:01:38
Re: Преглед на печата - 2010
19-03-2010 - 16:17:16
Quote
gogolcho
Евроюристи направиха на пух и прах проекта за конфискацията

gogolcho, мед ми капе на сърцето. По-некадърен проекто-закон не бях чел никога. А тази министърка май влезна в дълбоката мъгла на безличието. Ама Бойко си знае !
Черпя по едно !
*drunk*
Re: Преглед на печата - 2010
19-03-2010 - 16:51:21
avatar
Quote
Kavon
Кудрин: Имотите са най-минираното поле от всички класове активи

Техният вицепремиер сигурно също е с 5 лева в джоба като всички сривлювци тук и иска да купи евтино:

„Ако наблюдаваме ръст в цените на недвижимите имоти, то това е тревожен момент. Предкризисните цени, обаче няма да се върнат“ – допълни той.
neo
Re: Преглед на печата - 2010
19-03-2010 - 16:52:09
Борисов: Трябва да издържим една година, иначе фалираме [www.investor.bg]
Re: Преглед на печата - 2010
19-03-2010 - 17:34:06
С ЕДНАТА РЪКА ДАВА, С ДРУГАТА -ВЗЕМА. ЩО Е ТО?


ЕвроинтеграцияЕвропейската комисия ни глобява с 49 милиона лева17.03.2010 23:516 Санкцията е за неправомерни плащания за кампания от 2008-а



В Министерство на земеделието и храните (МЗХ) е получено писмо от Главна дирекция "Земеделие и развитие на селските райони" на Европейската комисия, с което България се уведомява, че ще бъде санкционирана с 49 млн. лв. за нарушения при кампанията за директните плащания на единица площ за земеделските производители през 2008 г.

Причината за глобата са установените застъпвания на площи, както и проблеми с процедурата по избор на изпълнител на ортофотокартата на земеделските земи.

Eвропейската комисия е започнала процедура по наказание за 24 543 106 евро от средствата за директни плащания на единица площ за 2008 г., съобщи министърът на земеделието и храните Мирослав Найденов.

Средствата ще бъдат удържани от предстоящите плащания за земеделските производители по кампанията за 2010 г.

Ще обжалваме решението на ЕК в законовия едномесечен срок с цел да намалим санкцията, категоричен е министър Найденов.

Преди месец с друго писмо Европейската комисия е уведомила страната ни, че ще бъде санкционирана с други 20 млн. лв. за нерегламентирано изплащане на субсидии за кампанията за 2007 г., допълват от МЗХ.
Re: Преглед на печата - 2010
19-03-2010 - 19:00:50
avatar
Quote
neo
Борисов: Трябва да издържим една година, иначе фалираме [www.investor.bg]
Беше март, после април, преди това лятото (или Дянков се махал), сега една година мъка... абе вярвайте в светлото бъдеще
Re: Преглед на печата - 2010
19-03-2010 - 23:11:08
avatar
Я, нова статия от Красимир Петров.
[www.marketoracle.co.uk]

The Road to Hyperinflation
Economics / HyperInflation
Mar 19, 2010 - 02:51 PM

By: Dr_Krassimir_Petrov



Inflationism is a slippery road – the road to hyperinflation. The inflationist Bernanke Fed behaves as if they would not be “dialling back” from Quantitative Easing any time soon. They talk the talk, but can’t walk the walk. The inflationary genie is out of the bottle. Taming it back will result in a crushing deflationary collapse. The Fed will never let this happen again. They did it once during the Great Depression, they won’t do it again.



The government’s reaction is typical of a crisis associated with economic collapse and social unrest. Hemingway put it so aptly: “The first panacea for a mismanaged nation is inflation of the currency; the second is war. Both bring a temporary prosperity; both bring a permanent ruin."

Three years ago Äripäev, Estonia’s leading daily business newspaper, published Alar Tamming’s article “Great Economic Crisis on the Way”. The article came out during the economic euphoria and the author himself is probably the only one who still remembers the final sentence: “... this time, do not complain that you were not forewarned.”

The economic crisis is well under way. However, there are major differences in predicting how the crisis will end. Yes, “under way”, because most people still think that we will be soon coming out of the crisis, may be even within a couple of months. Economic philosophizers still prognosticate that the economic boom is about re-emerge. Many in the Establishment even declare that the crisis is over. They forecast business as usual – the resurrection of the consumption-based economy, only if the banks were to start loaning again. Unfortunately, this will be impossible.

They are mostly wrong, as suggested by history and chaos theory. Even a superficial introduction to chaos theory leads us to observe that when a self-regulating system has reached the critical point, there is no returning to the previous level. Just like a capitalistic society cannot return back to slavery, or just like slavery cannot return back to the primeval society of hunters and gatherers, so we can no longer return to the capitalistic economic model that is based on consumption.

Development of all complex systems, whether we are dealing with a society, a business, or a human being, always take place in cycles. There is a time of balance (equilibrium), then a period of confusion (disequilibrium), and afterwards the system will be re-organised at a new, higher level, so that the problems that were a source of conflicts at the previous level will be resolved. This is the essence of Hegelian dialectics.

For example, everyone can see these processes happening to their children – how teenagers are full of conflicts during their puberty and how they will grow out of them stronger and smarter than before. Similarly, one can think of the end of the Soviet Era, when the system could no longer react to the external environment, which drove it to chaos; and then a new social order emerged, a qualitatively new system, based on private capital. Every entrepreneur probably remembers the same when thinking about development of his company, and can recall how crises have helped his company improve, if he ever managed to survive. Without proper resolution of internal and external conflicts through development, every system is doomed to fail. This is a basic application of Hegelian dialectics and a basic result associated with complex systems.

However, the current situation is rather complicated. The economic system has gone critical – it has reached point from where there is no turning back. The worst part is that the system cannot self-organise. “Normal” business organisation typically means that if you are doing business and make wrong decisions in a particular economic environment, then you should also suffer the consequences. In other words – if a bank has made bad loans, then we should let it fail. Failure is part of capitalism. Individuals and businesses that have deposited their money in this bank and, therefore, made a wrong decision, should also lose their money. Simple and logical, this is what capitalism is all about.

Unfortunately, governments and central banks do not want to accept that. They think that trying to feed a dead horse will bring it back to life. And if it won’t revive, then it has to be fed even more. They can vividly remember that when the horse was running strong, it had a good appetite. So the endless bailout packages are not going to revive the economy. Unfortunately, the system can no longer recover through normal pain – the Schumpeterian “creative destruction”. Instead, the result there will be a long period of excruciating suffering – a systemic implosion.

Even worse, thanks to the human factor, an even bigger problem awaits. The economy, which is just about to tailspin on one side of the road, will probably tailspin on the other side. This represents the current inflation-deflation debate. Everyone with a racing experience who has felt the car skid off the road knows that trying to countersteer too hard will get you in the ditch on the other side of the road. While the deflationary forces exert strong deflationary pressure, the inflationist Bernanke Fed is trying hard to countersteer with inflation. Some prices are indeed dropping now, but this is just the prelude to the real opus – hyperinflation.

Financial history teaches us that every time a financial crisis has been alleviated by printing more money instead of cutting costs and prices, it has ended up with hyperinflation. Zimbabwe is the most recent example, but the list is almost endless: Bulgaria, Russia, Ukraine, Turkey, Argentina, Mexico – the list goes on and on. We don’t need to add the years behind the crises – everyone can easily find these from the Internet. We refer the reader to our good friend Mike Hewitt, who has created an impressive compilation of such historical follies in his article “Hyperinflation Around the World”.

Hyperinflation goes with economy and finance just like attachments go with e-mails. Here is how the great economist Ludwig von Mises describes it:

„But then finally the masses wake up. They become suddenly aware of the fact that inflation is a deliberate policy and will go on endlessly. A breakdown occurs. The crack-up boom appears. Everybody is anxious to swap his money against "real" goods, no matter whether he needs them or not, no matter how much money he has to pay for them. Within a very short time, within a few weeks or even days, the things which were used as money are no longer used as media of exchange. They become scrap paper. Nobody wants to give away anything against them.”

Currency depreciation is actually quite common. A survey including 120 countries provides evidence that over the past 7 years, the currencies of 90 countries have lost at least half of their value. The thirty countries with relatively more “stable” currencies included mostly developed countries like the USA, Western European countries, Australia, and a few others that represent the “core” of the global monetary system.

However, this time the instability of the system has reached the core. The current economic policies can only lead us to one result – the destruction of the current global monetary system through hyperinflation. The flawed mainstream remedy, based on the failed doctrine of Keynesianism, is that in difficult times the state should intervene aggressively into the economy by spending more (and bailing out everybody) in order to protect jobs. To use one of Peter Schiff’s analogies, this is like poring gasoline on a fire; it only serves to speed up the hyperinflation. If the money for the stimulus actually exists in the government coffers as a result of previous savings, as is currently the case with Saudi Arabia, then this would be all right; unfortunately for the developed world (the “core” – U.S & Europe), this is not the case. And calling the spending without actual savings with fancy terms like “Keynesian stimulus” (or whatever) can’t possibly change the essence of things. The state provides for the stimulus with freshly-printed money that modern central bankers call euphemistically “Quantitative Easing”. It is a textbook example of “monetization” that is rapidly depreciating the currency and later on rendering it practically worthless. If printing more money and providing all sorts of stimuli and bailout packages could solve economic problems, then we would have been living in endless prosperity for hundreds of years, and Zimbabwe and Argentina would have been the economic powerhouses of the world.

Hyperinflation is not yet to be seen at the core, but the internal dynamics of process has its own inner logic and necessarily requires time. When a car backs out of a garage, it first backs up in one direction, before it drives off in the other. It appears for now that the U.S. auto manufacturers are saved, but this is actually a step towards hyperinflation. Eventually, costs will have to go up, then prices, and eventually salaries. In a positive feedback loop, higher wags lead to higher costs and higher prices – the dreaded wage-price spiral begins to speed up. Typically, a shortage of money develops and the social pressure to inflate becomes insurmountable – when inflation is speeding up, the government and business would go through tough times, because the revenues for goods and services sold will never be enough to pay for rising wages and prices of raw materials.

In a normal economic cycle, a profitable business will have more money (profits) after producing goods out of raw materials, so it can buy even more raw materials and grow; however, during hyperinflation business revenues are not enough to cover the rising cost of materials. So every production cycle generates a loss and the company becomes poorer and poorer. This simple concept may be hard to grasp at the moment for those who have never lived through hyperinflation, but when the time comes, it will be perfectly understood by almost everyone in the economy.

As grim as it may sound, there is a glimmer of hope – the beginning of the hyperinflation is also the beginning of the end for the Crisis. Financial assets accumulated by individuals and businesses during the boom years have to be destroyed – the price for our financial folly today will be paid tomorrow. There is no way around it, as the scarce economic resources backing these financial assets have been consumed through the sophisticated redistribution mechanisms of innovative financial instruments and deficit spending. Unfortunately, there is no such thing as a free lunch – the Baby Boomer generation has had an extra lunch today, but will have to skip the lunch tomorrow. The economic crisis is here and hyperinflation is on the way.

In conclusion, let us reiterate: “Don’t say you haven’t been forewarned.” But of course, this warning is just as good as giving a moralizing speech about drinking in a packed bar – no one would listen anyway. However, you have been warned – protect yourself, buy gold!

By Alar Tamming, Tavex and Dr. Krassimir Petrov,
Prince Sultan University

Alar Tamming has a Master's in Psychology. He is the founder and Chairman of the Supervisory Board of the TAVEX Group, the largest gold bullion dealer in Northern Europe. Visit www.tavex.eu to purchase your gold bullion coins and bars. Tavex can also help foreigners find storage in the safe jurisdictions of Sweden or Finland.

Krassimir Petrov ( Krassimir_Petrov@hotmail.com ) has received his Ph. D. in economics from the Ohio State University and currently teaches Macroeconomics, International Finance, and Econometrics at the American University in Bulgaria. He is looking for a career in Dubai or the U. A. E. Dr Krassimir Petrov Archive

НАЙ-ОБИЧАМ БОБА, ЛЕБА И ДА ЕБА!
Re: Преглед на печата - 2010
19-03-2010 - 23:52:51
avatar
Ха, Бойко Борисов и Симеон Дянков вместо да се чудят как да плашат хората с 3 години закъснение какъв хуй ги чака да попрочетат и да се замислят.Не е необходимо да се отрива топлата вода.преди повече от месец пуснах статия за това, описах как Банк оф Норт Дакота си функционира и подпомага бизнеса на Северна Дакота с публични пари повече от 90 години и си просперира.
Идеята вече почва да набира сила в САЩ.Дали нашите управници ще се сетят да копират?

накратко-банка се създава с основен капитал от бюджета на щата или държавата и си функционира на принципите на частната банка. като обаче дава кредити основно за местни предприятия , за фермерите, за студентски заеми.Както и за държавни разходи-заплати и други подобни при нулева лихва.Държавата после си погасява тези заеми от печалбата от самата банка, както и от новите събрани данъци от данъкоплатците.Доколкото си спомням, в Северна Дакота по закон всичките данъчни приходи се вкарват като капитал в такава публична банка.По един от проектите , описани в статията се правят изчисления, че от вложени 150 млн. държавни пари през публична банка може да се създаде до 1 млрд кредит, който да захрани бизнеса, заслужаващт кредитиране, а той да създава работни места в страната и да плаща данъци.
Разбира се, възнква въпроса за правилното и отговорното управление на банката и на кредитния риск при такава публична банка, но щом в Северна Дакота успяват да го правят 90 години успешно, значи е възможно.

П.П.Ако някога в България се създаде такава публична банка, си запазвам правото да изисквам да бъде кръстена по мое желание-БКБ-Българска Курдисана Банка! Все пак аз първи предложих такава.

[www.marketoracle.co.uk]

Creating our Own Credit, The Growing Movement for Publicly-Owned Banks
Politics / Credit Crisis 2010
Mar 18, 2010 - 05:18 PM

By: Ellen_Brown



As the states’ budget and credit crises deepen, four states have initiated bills for state-owned banks, and candidates in seven states have included that solution in their platforms.



"Hundreds of job-creating projects are still on hold because Michigan businesses and entrepreneurs cannot get bank financing. We can break the credit crunch and beat Wall Street at their own game by keeping our money right here in Michigan and investing it to retool our economy and create jobs."

--Lansing Mayor Virg Bernero in the Detroit News, May 9, 2010 

Michigan has an unemployment rate of 14% and has been particularly hard hit by the nation’s economic downturn. Virg Bernero, mayor of the state’s capitol and a leading Democratic candidate for governor, proposes that the state relieve its economic ills by opening a state-owned bank. He says the bank could protect consumers by making low-interest loans to those most in need, including students and small businesses; and could help community banks by buying mortgages off their books and working with them to fund development projects. 

Bernero joins a growing list of candidates proposing this sensible solution to their states’ fiscal ills.  Local economies have collapsed because of the Wall Street credit freeze. To reinvigorate local business, Main Street needs a heavy infusion of credit; and publicly-owned banks could fill that need.

A February posting tracked candidates in five states running on a state-bank platform and one state with a bill pending (Massachusetts).  There are now three more bills on the rolls – in Washington State, Illinois and Michigan – and two more candidates on the list of proponents (joining Bernero is Gaelan Brown of Vermont). That brings the total to seven candidates in as many states (Florida, Oregon, Illinois, California, Washington State, Vermont, and Idaho), including three Democrats, two Greens, one Republican and one Independent.  

The Independent, Vermont’s Gaelan Brown, says on his website, "Washington DC has lost all moral authority over Vermont." He maintains that:

"Vermont should explore creating a State-owned bank that would work with private VT-based banks, to insulate VT from Wall Street corruption, and to increase investment capital for VT businesses, modeled after the very successful State-owned Bank of North Dakota."

The Bank of North Dakota, currently the nation’s only state-owned bank, is the model (with variations) for all the other proposals on the table. The Bank of North Dakota acts as a "bankers’ bank," including doing "participation loans" with other banks, allowing them to compete with larger banks. In a participation loan, the community bank originates the loan and takes responsibility for it, while the participating bank contributes funds and shares in the risk and profits. The Bank of North Dakota also makes low-interest loans to students, farmers and businesses; underwrites municipal bonds; and serves as the state’s "Mini Fed," providing liquidity and clearing checks for more than 100 banks around the state.

Three New Bills Pending for Publicly-owned Banks

Proposals for publicly-owned banks in other states have now gone beyond the campaign talk of political hopefuls to be drafted into several bills.

The Michigan Development Bank

The Michigan bill has gotten the most press. Introduced into the legislature earlier this month, it mirrors Bernero’s state bank idea. According to a press release issued by Senate Democrats on March 9, the bill’s aim is to "keep Michigan’s money in Michigan" by putting tax dollars into a proposed "Michigan Development Bank". The Bank would function like a traditional bank but would focus on economic development rather than profit. The press release quoted Senator Gretchen Whitmer (D-East Lansing):

"Investing in the state’s economy is the greatest way to create jobs, and this proposal will provide small businesses and entrepreneurs the funding they need to invest and grow. Our economy has stagnated due in part to stale thinking in Lansing, and this is just the type of innovative idea we need to create real economic change, using our own money to rebuild the state."

Senate Democratic Leader Mike Prusi (D-Ishpeming) stated:

"Michigan’s economy has been suffering, and working families in the state have had difficulty keeping up with credit card bills, college tuition prices and mortgage payments. Establishing the Michigan Development Bank will keep our hard-earned dollars right here in the state to invest in small business, create good-paying jobs to get people back to work, and help protect the middle class."

Also quoted was Senator Hansen Clarke (D-Detroit):

"With the current state of our economy, every dollar counts, yet we’re depositing our money in other people’s pockets by investing in big corporate banks without seeing much lending in return. It’s time for the Mitten State to lend itself a helping hand and establish a bank that is willing to invest in our small businesses and offer the financial support necessary to see job growth."

For startup capital, Senate Democrats suggested that Michigan could sell voter-approved bonds. With an initial capitalization of $150 million, they estimated the bank could lend up to $1 billion to small businesses, students and farmers, and offer low-interest credit cards to consumers. For deposits, the bank could follow the model of the Bank of North Dakota and use state revenues. So says Gene Taliercio, a Republican candidate for the state Senate, who has also put his weight behind the Michigan Development Bank. In a video clip on the website of the local Oakland Press, he says:

"We’re talking about restructuring the whole tax system, in the sense that the way its set up is that all taxes are going to go into this central bank. . . . Every dollar that the state of Michigan makes goes into this bank."

The State Bank of Washington

A similar bill, HB 3162, was introduced to the Washington State Legislature on February 1. The bill has generated so much interest that Steve Kirby, chair of the Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee, has scheduled a special work session on it. According to John Nichols in The Nation, the State Bank of Washington was formally proposed by House finance committee vice chair Bob Hasegawa, a Seattle Democrat. Nichols quotes Hasegawa:

"Imagine financing student aid, infrastructure, industry and community development. Imagine providing access to capital for small businesses, or otherwise leveraging our resources instead of having to do it with tax incentives. Imagine keeping our resources local instead of exporting them as profits, never to be seen again—that’s what this bank could do."

Leveraging rather than taxing is how private banks have been creating "credit" for centuries. States could do the same thing, cutting the middlemen out of the equation, saving significant sums in interest and fees and generating revenue for the state.

A nonpartisan analysis of the Washington bill prepared for the state legislature noted that the bank would be the depository for all state funds and the funds of state institutions, and that these deposits would be guaranteed by the state. The bank would be run by a board of 11 members and would be chaired by the State Treasurer. It would have the same rules and privileges as a private bank chartered in the state. To get the bank off the ground, voters would have to approve amendments to the state Constitution, since current law prohibits the state from lending credit and investing in private firms.

The Community Bank of Illinois

A third bill, introduced by Illinois Representative Mary Flowers, is on its way through the legislative process in Illinois. According to the Illinois General Assembly website, the Community Bank of Illinois Act would establish a state bank with the express purpose of boosting agriculture, commerce and industry. State funds and money held by penal, educational, and industrial institutions owned by the state would be deposited in the bank and would serve as reserves for loans. The bank could also serve as a clearinghouse for other banks, including handling domestic and foreign exchange; and it could buy property under Eminent Domain. All deposits would be guaranteed with the assets of the state. The Bank would be managed and controlled by the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, with input from an advisory board representing private banking and public interests.

An amendment to the initial bill would enable the Community Bank of Illinois to make loans directly to the state’s General Revenue Fund, helping the state cope with its current budget challenges.

A Massachusetts-owned Bank

On March 12, the Associated Press reported that a jobs bill sponsored by Massachusetts Senate President Therese Murray also includes a call to study a Massachusetts-owned bank. She told a business group that a state-owned bank has worked in North Dakota, helping to insulate that state from the worst of the recession while also keeping its foreclosure rate down. A state-owned bank could spur job creation and free up lending to Massachusetts businesses.

Grandfather of the Concept: The Bank of North Dakota

All of these proposals take their inspiration from the Bank of North Dakota, which was founded in 1919 to resolve a credit crisis like that facing other states today. Last year, North Dakota had the largest budget surplus it had ever had; and it was the only state that was actually adding jobs when others were losing them. In March 2009, when 46 of 50 states were in fiscal crisis, North Dakota was in the enviable position of discussing tax cuts and looking for ways to spend its surplus.

By January 2010, according to a National Public Radio news clip, only two states could still meet their budgets – North Dakota and Montana. On February 8, however, the Montana paper the Missoulian reported that the Montana State Legislature’s chief revenue forecaster foresees a budget deficit by mid-2011, leaving North Dakota the only state still boasting a surplus.

North Dakota’s riches have been attributed to oil, but many states with oil are floundering. The sole truly distinguishing feature of North Dakota seems to be that it has managed to avoid the Wall Street credit freeze by owning and operating its own bank. According to the North Dakota Department of Commerce, the BND turned a profit in 2009 of $58.1 million; and this money goes into the state’s General Fund. North Dakota’s economy is ten times smaller than Michigan’s, suggesting that Michigan could generate $500 million per year in this way; and Washington State and Illinois present similarly inviting possibilities.

That defuses the objection raised in a March 15 editorial in The Detroit News, arguing that Michigan can ill afford the $150 million capital investment to start a bank. If operated like the BND, the Michigan Development Bank would soon be a net generator of state revenues. There are other possibilities besides a bond issue for providing the capital to start a bank, but that subject will be reserved for another article.

The BND’s 90-year track record of prudent and profitable lending defuses another objection to state-owned banks: that a public agency cannot be trusted to act responsibly in managing public funds. The Detroit News editorial concluded that Michigan should "leave banking to the bankers," but it is precisely because the bankers have destroyed the economy with their reckless lending practices that the public needs to step in. We need a "public option" in banking to set standards and keep private banks honest.

The True Potential of Publicly-owned Banks

North Dakota broke new ground nearly a century ago, but the true potential of publicly-owned banks remains to be explored. Nearly all of our money today is created by banks when they extend loans. (See the Chicago Federal Reserve’s "Modern Money Mechanics", which begins, "The actual process of money creation takes place primarily in banks."winking smiley We the people have given away our sovereign money-creating power to private, for-profit lending institutions, which have used it to siphon wealth from the productive economy. If we were to take that power back, we could generate the credit we need to underwrite a whole cornucopia of projects that we don’t even consider because we think we lack the "money."  We have the labor and we have the materials; we just lack the "liquidity" necessary to put them together to create products and services.

Money today is just a ticket, a receipt for work performed and goods delivered.  We can fund the work we need done by creating our own credit. The real promise of publicly-owned banks is not that they can bail out subprime borrowers but that they can jumpstart the economy by creating real wealth. They can provide the liquidity to put labor and materials together, allowing the economy to build and grow. Our private, profit-driven banking sector has been bleeding wealth from the rest of the economy. Public-interest banks can transfuse the economy with the credit it needs to flourish and be productive once again.

For more updates on the movement for publicly-owned banks, see [www.public-banking.com]. To sign a petition for a citizen-owned bank in California, go to [www.change.org].

Ellen Brown developed her research skills as an attorney practicing civil litigation in Los Angeles. In Web of Debt, her latest book, she turns those skills to an analysis of the Federal Reserve and “the money trust.” She shows how this private cartel has usurped the power to create money from the people themselves, and how we the people can get it back. Her earlier books focused on the pharmaceutical cartel that gets its power from “the money trust.” Her eleven books include Forbidden Medicine, Nature’s Pharmacy (co-authored with Dr. Lynne Walker), and The Key to Ultimate Health (co-authored with Dr. Richard Hansen). Her websites are www.webofdebt.com and www.ellenbrown.com.

Ellen Brown is a frequent contributor to Global Research. Global Research Articles by Ellen Brown

© Copyright Ellen Brown , Global Research, 2010

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.


© 2005-2010 [www.MarketOracle.co.uk] - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.





Comments

НАЙ-ОБИЧАМ БОБА, ЛЕБА И ДА ЕБА!
Съжаляваме, само регистрирани потребители могат да публикуват в този форум.

Натиснете тук за вход